Clay vs Qubstudio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Qubstudio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Clay (4.0/5) overall. Qubstudio is the better choice for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign.. Clay is the stronger option for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies seeking a boutique studio with a big-tech-caliber client list.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Clay vs Qubstudio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Clay | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2015 | 2006 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | London, UK (Canary Wharf), Ukraine-based delivery team |
| Team size | Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) | 51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals) |
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Best for | B2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies seeking a boutique studio with a big-tech-caliber client list. | Fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Framer, Webflow | Figma, Sketch, Webflow |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
Clay vs Qubstudio: overview
Clay
Clay (clay.global) is a San Francisco-based product design studio with substantial NYC client work. The company does not publish a founding year, so it is tagged here as unconfirmed, and team size is likewise not independently verifiable — best treated as boutique-to-mid-size. Its client roster spans Coinbase, Uber, SendGrid, MoneyLion, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon, Toyota, and Samsung, with deep B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech experience. Note: this is distinct from the unrelated AI sales-data company also named Clay (clay.com).
Qubstudio
Qubstudio dates to around 2006 (some sources say 2007) and is headquartered in London's Canary Wharf with a Ukraine-based delivery team. The company describes roughly 70 creative professionals within a broader 51–200 employee band. Qubstudio's 2026 Clutch ranking places it #1 among UX/UI agencies with 90+ reviews, backed by Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition. Client work spans fintech, logistics, healthcare, and EdTech, from new MVPs through enterprise-scale redesigns.
Services and capabilities: Clay vs Qubstudio
| Capability | Clay | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Clay vs Qubstudio
| Framework / platform | Clay | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | ✓ | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Clay vs Qubstudio
| Criterion | Clay | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Clay vs Qubstudio
| Dimension | Clay | Qubstudio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup, Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Fintech MVP launch design, Logistics platform UX overhaul |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Clay vs Qubstudio: pros and cons
| Clay | |
|---|---|
| + | Client list (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack, Snapchat, Amazon) is exceptional for a boutique-to-mid-size studio |
| + | Deep, specific track record across B2B, SaaS, AI, and fintech product design |
| + | San Francisco base with strong NYC client relationships |
| + | Combines UX design, branding, and web/product design under one roof |
| - | Founding year is not independently confirmed anywhere outside the company's own materials |
| - | Team size is neither published nor independently verifiable, complicating capacity planning for large programs |
| - | Easy to confuse with the unrelated AI company Clay (clay.com) when researching — confirm you're looking at clay.global |
| Qubstudio | |
|---|---|
| + | #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ public reviews |
| + | Independently verified via Red Dot Design Award and UX Design Awards recognition |
| + | Nearly two decades of operation with a stable London HQ and Ukraine delivery team |
| + | Covers everything from MVP launches to enterprise digital transformation |
| - | Founding year is disputed between sources (2006 vs. 2007) — treated as approximate |
| - | Ukraine-based delivery team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted studios |
| - | The 51–200 directory band is wide; the company's own ~70 figure is more precise but self-reported |
Who should choose Clay?
Clay is the right choice for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies seeking a boutique studio with a big-tech-caliber client list..
A client roster (Coinbase, Uber, Meta, Google, Slack) that's unusually strong relative to its unconfirmed, boutique-scale headcount. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Consumer products.
Who should choose Qubstudio?
Qubstudio is the right choice for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign..
#1 UX/UI agency on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with Red Dot Design Award recognition on top. Minimum engagement starts at $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: Clay vs Qubstudio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Clay |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Qubstudio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Clay (Not published) vs Qubstudio ($15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Clay |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Clay vs Qubstudio
| Use case | Clay fit | Qubstudio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI or fintech product design for a Series A-C startup | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Consumer app design for a high-growth B2B SaaS brand | Strong | Limited | Clay |
| Fintech MVP launch design | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Logistics platform UX overhaul | Limited | Strong | Qubstudio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Clay vs Qubstudio
Qubstudio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. #1 UX/UI agency on Clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with Red Dot Design Award recognition on top. It is best for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign..
Clay (4.0/5) is the better choice when b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies seeking a boutique studio with a big-tech-caliber client list.. If your situation matches those criteria, Clay is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Clay vs Qubstudio FAQ
Is Clay better than Qubstudio?
Qubstudio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Clay is better for b2B SaaS, AI, and fintech companies seeking a boutique studio with a big-tech-caliber client list.. Qubstudio is better for fintech, logistics, and healthcare companies needing anything from a new MVP to an enterprise redesign..
How do Clay and Qubstudio differ in pricing?
Clay uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Qubstudio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Clay or Qubstudio?
Qubstudio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Clay and Qubstudio?
Clay's primary differentiator is: a client roster (coinbase, uber, meta, google, slack) that's unusually strong relative to its unconfirmed, boutique-scale headcount. Qubstudio's primary differentiator is: #1 ux/ui agency on clutch's 2026 rankings across 90+ reviews, with red dot design award recognition on top. They also differ in team size (Boutique-to-mid (unconfirmed; not published by the company) vs 51–200 (company states ~70 creative professionals)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs Financial services / fintech, Healthcare).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.