EPAM Continuum vs Goji Labs: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Goji Labs (3.9/5) edges ahead of EPAM Continuum (3.7/5) overall. Goji Labs is the better choice for Startups, entrepreneurs, nonprofits — strategy-led, accessible pricing. EPAM Continuum is the stronger option for Enterprises, design integrated with strategy and engineering. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EPAM Continuum vs Goji Labs: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EPAM Continuum | Goji Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1983 | 2014 |
| HQ | Boston, MA, USA | West Hollywood / Los Angeles, CA, USA |
| Team size | Not published (operates within EPAM's global engineering workforce) | 11–50 |
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Carries Continuum's decades-old industrial-design pedigree (the Reebok Pump) into EPAM's enterprise software engineering scale | A 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly serves nonprofits and entrepreneurs, not only funded startups |
| Pricing model | Enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) | Fixed project, T&M |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, Design systems/Storybook | Figma, React, Swift |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Consumer products | EdTech, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
EPAM Continuum vs Goji Labs: overview
EPAM Continuum
Continuum's design pedigree predates most of the firms on this list — Gianfranco Zaccai founded it in Boston in 1983, and the studio went on to shape landmark industrial-design work including the Reebok Pump. EPAM Systems acquired Continuum in 2018, folding it into what's now EPAM Continuum, a practice that fuses strategy, design, and engineering rather than treating design as a standalone deliverable. That combination — decades-old industrial-design credibility running inside a large enterprise software engineering consultancy — is unusual among the names in this list.
Goji Labs
David Barlev and Adam Sumner founded Goji Labs in 2014 (one source says 2015), building a strategy-led practice from West Hollywood/Los Angeles with 11–50 employees. The agency made the 2025 Inc. 5000 list and carries 84 Clutch reviews, with deep experience in edtech, fintech, and healthtech. What sets it apart from most boutiques in this roster: Goji explicitly serves nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs, not only venture-funded companies.
Services and capabilities: EPAM Continuum vs Goji Labs
| Capability | EPAM Continuum | Goji Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: EPAM Continuum vs Goji Labs
| Framework / platform | EPAM Continuum | Goji Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | ✓ | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: EPAM Continuum vs Goji Labs
| Criterion | EPAM Continuum | Goji Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Time & materials |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: EPAM Continuum vs Goji Labs
| Dimension | EPAM Continuum | Goji Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Consumer products | EdTech, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | Enterprise product design bundled with large-scale software engineering delivery, Legacy industrial-design-adjacent hardware-software product programs | Nonprofit or mission-driven product design, EdTech or healthtech MVP for an early-stage startup |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
EPAM Continuum vs Goji Labs: pros and cons
| EPAM Continuum | |
|---|---|
| + | Decades of design pedigree predating most agencies on this list, including landmark industrial-design work |
| + | Integrates strategy, design, and engineering rather than treating design as a standalone deliverable |
| + | Backed by EPAM's much larger global technology-consulting and engineering bench |
| + | Long operating history gives it enterprise case studies across multiple industries |
| - | Acquired into EPAM Systems in 2018 — no longer an independent design consultancy |
| - | Consultancy scale and pricing are less accessible to startups than boutique studios |
| - | Design work here comes bundled with broader technology consulting rather than offered as a standalone service |
| Goji Labs | |
|---|---|
| + | Independently verified 2025 Inc. 5000 growth recognition |
| + | 84 Clutch reviews provide a substantial independent feedback sample |
| + | Explicitly serves nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs, not only funded startups |
| + | Strategy-led approach pairs product discovery with delivery inside one team |
| - | The 11–50 employee band is smaller than most other boutiques here, limiting capacity for very large programs |
| - | Founding year is disputed between sources (2014 vs. 2015) |
| - | Focus on edtech/fintech/healthtech means less depth for consumer or enterprise-only projects |
Who should choose EPAM Continuum?
A typical fit: enterprise product design bundled with large-scale software engineering delivery.
Carries Continuum's decades-old industrial-design pedigree (the Reebok Pump) into EPAM's enterprise software engineering scale. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Consumer products.
Who should choose Goji Labs?
A typical fit: nonprofit or mission-driven product design.
A 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly serves nonprofits and entrepreneurs, not only funded startups. Minimum engagement starts at $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in EdTech, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.
Decision matrix: EPAM Continuum vs Goji Labs
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | EPAM Continuum |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Continuum |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EPAM Continuum (Not published) vs Goji Labs ($15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Continuum |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: EPAM Continuum vs Goji Labs
| Use case | EPAM Continuum fit | Goji Labs fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise product design bundled with large-scale software engineering delivery | Strong | Limited | EPAM Continuum |
| Legacy industrial-design-adjacent hardware-software product programs | Strong | Limited | EPAM Continuum |
| Nonprofit or mission-driven product design | Limited | Strong | Goji Labs |
| EdTech or healthtech MVP for an early-stage startup | Limited | Strong | Goji Labs |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: EPAM Continuum vs Goji Labs
Goji Labs (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly serves nonprofits and entrepreneurs, not only funded startups.
EPAM Continuum (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need legacy industrial-design-adjacent hardware-software product programs. If your situation matches that, EPAM Continuum is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EPAM Continuum vs Goji Labs FAQ
Is EPAM Continuum better than Goji Labs?
Goji Labs (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EPAM Continuum's strongest advantage: decades of design pedigree predating most agencies on this list, including landmark industrial-design work. Goji Labs's strongest advantage: independently verified 2025 Inc. 5000 growth recognition.
How do EPAM Continuum and Goji Labs differ in pricing?
EPAM Continuum uses enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Goji Labs uses fixed project, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EPAM Continuum or Goji Labs?
Goji Labs is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EPAM Continuum and Goji Labs?
EPAM Continuum's primary differentiator is: carries Continuum's decades-old industrial-design pedigree (the Reebok Pump) into EPAM's enterprise software engineering scale. Goji Labs's primary differentiator is: a 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly serves nonprofits and entrepreneurs, not only funded startups. They also differ in team size (Not published (operates within EPAM's global engineering workforce) vs 11–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Healthcare vs EdTech, Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.