Top Product Design Agencies

Fresh Tilled Soil vs UXDA: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

UXDA (4.3/5) edges ahead of Fresh Tilled Soil (3.9/5) overall. UXDA is the better choice for Banks, fintech — exclusively financial-services UX. Fresh Tilled Soil is the stronger option for Mid-market, enterprise — long-tenured Boston UX boutique. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Fresh Tilled Soil vs UXDA: head-to-head summary

Criterion Fresh Tilled Soil UXDA
Founded 2005 2015
HQ Boston, MA, USA Riga, Latvia
Team size 11–50 25+
Rating 3.9 / 5 4.3 / 5
Primary differentiator 700+ delivered projects over two decades from a compact 11–50 person team, now operating inside the ADK Group The only studio in this roster built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries
Pricing model Fixed project Fixed project, retainer
Min. engagement Not published $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Figma, Sketch, React Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook
Industries served Enterprise transformation, Consumer products Financial services / fintech

Fresh Tilled Soil vs UXDA: overview

Fresh Tilled Soil

Fresh Tilled Soil opened in Boston in 2005, building a UX/UI design and front-end development practice with clients including FedEx, GE, Titleist, and Boston Private Bank across more than 700 projects. In 2020 the firm joined ADK Group, operating today as "Fresh Tilled Soil, an ADK Group Company" — a detail worth knowing since it's no longer fully independent. The team stays compact at 11–50 people, keeping the studio boutique in feel even inside a larger group structure.

UXDA

Alex Kreger co-founded UXDA (Financial UX Design) in 2015, building a deliberately narrow 25-person team from Riga, Latvia. A decade later, UXDA has shaped or governed 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms in 39 countries — a level of single-vertical repetition none of the generalists in this list can claim, since there's no branding or consumer-product work on offer. Every engagement here is financial-services UX.

Services and capabilities: Fresh Tilled Soil vs UXDA

Capability Fresh Tilled Soil UXDA
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: Fresh Tilled Soil vs UXDA

Framework / platform Fresh Tilled Soil UXDA
Figma
Webflow N/A N/A
React N/A
Framer N/A N/A
Adobe Creative Suite N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A
After Effects N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: Fresh Tilled Soil vs UXDA

Criterion Fresh Tilled Soil UXDA
Minimum engagement Not published $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Dedicated team Fixed project, Retainer
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Mid-market Accessible

Target audience comparison: Fresh Tilled Soil vs UXDA

Dimension Fresh Tilled Soil UXDA
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Enterprise transformation, Consumer products Financial services / fintech
Best use cases UX/UI redesign for a mid-market or enterprise brand, Front-end development paired with UX design for an existing product Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

Fresh Tilled Soil vs UXDA: pros and cons

Fresh Tilled Soil
+ 700+ delivered projects since 2005 across a named client list including FedEx and GE
+ Two decades of continuous operation under the same brand
+ Compact 11–50 person team keeps client relationships direct
+ ADK Group membership since 2020 adds access to a broader group's resources
- No longer fully independent — operates as part of ADK Group since 2020
- An 11–50 person team caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs
- Pricing and minimum engagement size aren't published
UXDA
+ Exclusive financial-services focus builds domain expertise generalist studios simply can't match
+ 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade
+ Small, senior 25+ team keeps client relationships direct rather than layered through account management
+ A decade of continuous, single-vertical operation compounds domain knowledge over time
- The exclusive fintech focus is a real limitation for any client outside financial services
- $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) runs higher than most 25-person boutiques
- Small team size (25+) caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs

Who should choose Fresh Tilled Soil?

A typical fit: UX/UI redesign for a mid-market or enterprise brand.

700+ delivered projects over two decades from a compact 11–50 person team, now operating inside the ADK Group. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products.

Who should choose UXDA?

A typical fit: bank digital platform redesign.

The only studio in this roster built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.

Decision matrix: Fresh Tilled Soil vs UXDA

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Fresh Tilled Soil
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Fresh Tilled Soil
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Fresh Tilled Soil (Not published) vs UXDA ($30K (per company website; independently unverifiable))
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Fresh Tilled Soil
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Fresh Tilled Soil vs UXDA

Use case Fresh Tilled Soil fit UXDA fit Winner
UX/UI redesign for a mid-market or enterprise brand Strong Limited Fresh Tilled Soil
Front-end development paired with UX design for an existing product Strong Limited Fresh Tilled Soil
Bank digital platform redesign Limited Strong UXDA
Fintech app UX for a regulated market Limited Strong UXDA
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Fresh Tilled Soil vs UXDA

UXDA (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. The only studio in this roster built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries.

Fresh Tilled Soil (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need front-end development paired with UX design for an existing product. If your situation matches that, Fresh Tilled Soil is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Fresh Tilled Soil vs UXDA FAQ

Is Fresh Tilled Soil better than UXDA?

UXDA (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Fresh Tilled Soil's strongest advantage: 700+ delivered projects since 2005 across a named client list including FedEx and GE. UXDA's strongest advantage: exclusive financial-services focus builds domain expertise generalist studios simply can't match.

How do Fresh Tilled Soil and UXDA differ in pricing?

Fresh Tilled Soil uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Fresh Tilled Soil or UXDA?

Fresh Tilled Soil is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Fresh Tilled Soil and UXDA?

Fresh Tilled Soil's primary differentiator is: 700+ delivered projects over two decades from a compact 11–50 person team, now operating inside the ADK Group. UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only studio in this roster built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. They also differ in team size (11–50 vs 25+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs Financial services / fintech).

Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.