Frog vs Gapsy Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Frog (3.7/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for Fintech, SaaS, healthcare — 5.0-rated boutique, deep track record. Frog is the stronger option for Enterprises, digital plus physical product design, one team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Frog vs Gapsy Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Frog | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1969 | 2014 |
| HQ | San Francisco, CA, USA | Dnipro, Ukraine |
| Team size | 2,000+ | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) |
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Still designs physical hardware (IoT, automotive, medical devices) alongside software — a combined scope most of its peers have abandoned | A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount |
| Pricing model | Project-based, enterprise consulting engagements | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, Miro | Figma, Webflow, After Effects |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail |
Frog vs Gapsy Studio: overview
Frog
The frog name has carried through several owners since its 1969 start as Esslinger Design — Aricent, then Altran, then Capgemini, which folded the studio into Capgemini Invent in 2019. Since then, Capgemini has consolidated Fahrenheit 212, Idean, and June21 under the same brand, landing at roughly 2,000 people across 35 studios. The trait that still separates frog from most names on this list: it designs physical products — IoT devices, automotive interiors, medical hardware — with the same team that handles software, a combination getting rarer every year.
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes its own history as running "since 2014" — treated here as self-reported since it's not independently confirmed — from a base in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than stating a team size, the studio calls itself a "collective of creative professionals," pointing instead to 500+ completed projects and a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews. Thirteen-plus international awards from Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush back the rating, and the studio's client work spans fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail.
Services and capabilities: Frog vs Gapsy Studio
| Capability | Frog | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Frog vs Gapsy Studio
| Framework / platform | Frog | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | ✓ | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Frog vs Gapsy Studio
| Criterion | Frog | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Frog vs Gapsy Studio
| Dimension | Frog | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | IoT and connected hardware product design, Automotive and smart-home interface design | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Frog vs Gapsy Studio: pros and cons
| Frog | |
|---|---|
| + | Combined software-and-hardware design capability spanning IoT, automotive, and medical devices |
| + | 35 studios worldwide support genuine multi-region enterprise delivery |
| + | Over five decades of design history and case studies to draw on |
| + | Capgemini Invent backing adds broader technology-consulting resources on top of design |
| - | Now a Capgemini Invent brand rather than an independent studio — a structural fact worth disclosing to clients |
| - | Multiple legacy agencies (Fahrenheit 212, Idean, June21) were folded into the frog name, risking inconsistent team continuity |
| - | Large consulting-firm overhead can slow faster-moving engagements relative to boutique studios |
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this roster |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
Who should choose Frog?
A typical fit: IoT and connected hardware product design.
Still designs physical hardware (IoT, automotive, medical devices) alongside software — a combined scope most of its peers have abandoned. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Healthcare.
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
A typical fit: fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work.
A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Decision matrix: Frog vs Gapsy Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Frog |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Frog (Not published) vs Gapsy Studio ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Frog vs Gapsy Studio
| Use case | Frog fit | Gapsy Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| IoT and connected hardware product design | Strong | Limited | Frog |
| Automotive and smart-home interface design | Strong | Limited | Frog |
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Limited | Strong | Gapsy Studio |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Limited | Strong | Gapsy Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Frog vs Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount.
Frog (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need automotive and smart-home interface design. If your situation matches that, Frog is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Frog vs Gapsy Studio FAQ
Is Frog better than Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Frog's strongest advantage: combined software-and-hardware design capability spanning IoT, automotive, and medical devices. Gapsy Studio's strongest advantage: 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this roster.
How do Frog and Gapsy Studio differ in pricing?
Frog uses project-based, enterprise consulting engagements pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Frog or Gapsy Studio?
Frog is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Frog and Gapsy Studio?
Frog's primary differentiator is: still designs physical hardware (IoT, automotive, medical devices) alongside software — a combined scope most of its peers have abandoned. Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount. They also differ in team size (2,000+ vs Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.