Top Product Design Agencies

Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) edges ahead of Eleken (4.1/5) overall. Phenomenon Studio is the better choice for SaaS, fintech, healthcare, EdTech — senior-only team, no junior layer. Eleken is the stronger option for SaaS teams, subscription embedded designer, no fixed-price haggling. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken: head-to-head summary

Criterion Phenomenon Studio Eleken
Founded 2019 2015
HQ Europe (entities in the USA, Estonia, and Switzerland) Distributed team, roots in Kyiv, Ukraine
Team size 70+ 40+ to 100+ (approximate; reported figures vary by source)
Rating 4.8 / 5 4.1 / 5
Primary differentiator Built around 70+ senior specialists across USA, Estonia, and Switzerland entities — no junior bench to hand work off to — serving four deliberately chosen verticals: SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and EdTech A SaaS-only subscription embedded-designer model (~$6,599/month) with a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects
Pricing model Project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) Subscription (dedicated full-time or part-time designer)
Min. engagement Not published $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Figma, Webflow, React Figma, Design systems/Storybook, Miro
Industries served SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech SaaS / B2B software

Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken: overview

Phenomenon Studio

Founded in 2019, Phenomenon Studio built its team deliberately across three legal entities — the USA, Estonia, and Switzerland — while keeping delivery centered in Europe, giving it 70+ senior specialists rather than a large junior bench. The studio works almost exclusively with SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and EdTech companies, verticals chosen because they reward the kind of structured discovery Phenomenon runs before any design work starts. That discovery-first sequence, followed by design, development, and post-launch support under the same senior team, is why the studio has shipped 120+ products behind a combined $500M+ in client fundraising. A 5.0 Clutch rating, HIPAA compliance verified by Compliancy Group, and NN/g UX certification back the claims with third-party verification rather than self-reported marketing copy.

Eleken

Eleken traces to 2015 with roots in Kyiv, Ukraine, and now operates as a distributed team reported at anywhere from 40+ to 100+ designers depending on the source. Instead of quoting a fixed project price, Eleken sells a subscription — roughly $6,599 a month for a dedicated full-time designer, with part-time also available — a genuinely different model from the fixed-price and T&M norm found elsewhere in this roster. The studio is SaaS-only, holding a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects and covering complex B2B, AI, data, and geospatial or low-code/no-code products.

Services and capabilities: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken

Capability Phenomenon Studio Eleken
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken

Framework / platform Phenomenon Studio Eleken
Figma
Webflow N/A
React N/A
Framer N/A
Adobe Creative Suite N/A N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A
After Effects N/A

Pricing comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken

Criterion Phenomenon Studio Eleken
Minimum engagement Not published $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team Subscription
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Mid-market Accessible

Target audience comparison: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken

Dimension Phenomenon Studio Eleken
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare SaaS / B2B software
Best use cases A fintech company needing HIPAA- or compliance-aware UX ahead of a funding round, A SaaS platform rebuilding its product with one senior team from strategy through launch Embedded product designer for an ongoing SaaS roadmap, Complex B2B or AI product design on a monthly subscription
Typical project type Fixed project Subscription

Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken: pros and cons

Phenomenon Studio
+ 70+ senior specialists with no junior delivery layer to hand projects off to
+ Structured discovery phase runs before any design work begins on every engagement
+ 5.0 Clutch rating alongside Top 1000 Company 2025 and Top Design Company USA 2026 recognition
+ HIPAA compliance independently verified and monitored by Compliancy Group
+ NN/g UX Certification and Webflow Experts partner status across four certification tiers
+ 120+ shipped products behind a combined $500M+ in client fundraising
- Deliberately narrow to four verticals — SaaS, fintech, healthcare, EdTech — so it's not the right fit outside those industries
- Discovery-first sequencing means visible design work starts later than at agencies that skip straight to UI
- No published rate card; pricing requires a discovery call
Eleken
+ 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ completed projects and 70+ published case studies
+ Subscription pricing gives predictable monthly cost instead of a large fixed-price contract
+ SaaS-only focus, including complex B2B, AI, data, and geospatial products, builds real vertical depth
+ Part-time subscription option available for teams that don't need a full-time designer
- Reported team size varies widely by source (40+ to 100+), making capacity planning imprecise
- SaaS-only positioning rules it out for consumer, healthcare, or brand-led engagements
- Subscription pricing can cost more than a fixed-price project for a short, well-defined engagement

Who should choose Phenomenon Studio?

A typical fit: a fintech company needing HIPAA- or compliance-aware UX ahead of a funding round.

Built around 70+ senior specialists across USA, Estonia, and Switzerland entities — no junior bench to hand work off to — serving four deliberately chosen verticals: SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and EdTech. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, EdTech.

Who should choose Eleken?

A typical fit: embedded product designer for an ongoing SaaS roadmap.

A SaaS-only subscription embedded-designer model (~$6,599/month) with a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects. Minimum engagement starts at $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software.

Decision matrix: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope Phenomenon Studio
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Phenomenon Studio
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: Phenomenon Studio (Not published) vs Eleken ($6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable))
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Phenomenon Studio
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken

Use case Phenomenon Studio fit Eleken fit Winner
A fintech company needing HIPAA- or compliance-aware UX ahead of a funding round Strong Strong Both equally
A SaaS platform rebuilding its product with one senior team from strategy through launch Strong Strong Both equally
Embedded product designer for an ongoing SaaS roadmap Limited Strong Eleken
Complex B2B or AI product design on a monthly subscription Limited Strong Eleken
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken

Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Built around 70+ senior specialists across USA, Estonia, and Switzerland entities — no junior bench to hand work off to — serving four deliberately chosen verticals: SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and EdTech.

Eleken (4.1/5) is worth a look if you need complex B2B or AI product design on a monthly subscription. If your situation matches that, Eleken is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

Phenomenon Studio vs Eleken FAQ

Is Phenomenon Studio better than Eleken?

Phenomenon Studio (4.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Phenomenon Studio's strongest advantage: 70+ senior specialists with no junior delivery layer to hand projects off to. Eleken's strongest advantage: 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ completed projects and 70+ published case studies.

How do Phenomenon Studio and Eleken differ in pricing?

Phenomenon Studio uses project-based, full-cycle engagements (fixed scope or retainer — not published; contact for quote) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Eleken uses subscription (dedicated full-time or part-time designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: Phenomenon Studio or Eleken?

Eleken is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between Phenomenon Studio and Eleken?

Phenomenon Studio's primary differentiator is: built around 70+ senior specialists across USA, Estonia, and Switzerland entities — no junior bench to hand work off to — serving four deliberately chosen verticals: SaaS, fintech, healthcare, and EdTech. Eleken's primary differentiator is: a SaaS-only subscription embedded-designer model (~$6,599/month) with a 4.9 Clutch rating across 200+ projects. They also differ in team size (70+ vs 40+ to 100+ (approximate; reported figures vary by source)), minimum engagement (Not published vs $6,599/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software).

Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.