Top Product Design Agencies

R/GA vs Goji Labs: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Goji Labs (3.9/5) edges ahead of R/GA (3.7/5) overall. Goji Labs is the better choice for Startups, entrepreneurs, nonprofits — strategy-led, accessible pricing. R/GA is the stronger option for global brands, product design bundled with brand strategy. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

R/GA vs Goji Labs: head-to-head summary

Criterion R/GA Goji Labs
Founded 1977 2014
HQ New York City, NY, USA West Hollywood / Los Angeles, CA, USA
Team size ~2,000 11–50
Rating 3.7 / 5 3.9 / 5
Primary differentiator Fuses product design with marketing and brand strategy for large platforms, now operating independently for the first time in over two decades A 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly serves nonprofits and entrepreneurs, not only funded startups
Pricing model Project-based, retainer for ongoing programs Fixed project, T&M
Min. engagement Not published $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, After Effects Figma, React, Swift
Industries served Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment EdTech, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare

R/GA vs Goji Labs: overview

R/GA

R/GA has run out of New York since 1977, expanding to ten countries with offices from Austin to Singapore. Interpublic Group owned it for 23 years until March 2025, when R/GA completed an independent buyout backed by private equity firm Truelink Capital. What hasn't changed across that ownership history is the pitch: product design fused with marketing and brand strategy, aimed at large consumer and enterprise platforms rather than single-scope product work.

Goji Labs

David Barlev and Adam Sumner founded Goji Labs in 2014 (one source says 2015), building a strategy-led practice from West Hollywood/Los Angeles with 11–50 employees. The agency made the 2025 Inc. 5000 list and carries 84 Clutch reviews, with deep experience in edtech, fintech, and healthtech. What sets it apart from most boutiques in this roster: Goji explicitly serves nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs, not only venture-funded companies.

Services and capabilities: R/GA vs Goji Labs

Capability R/GA Goji Labs
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: R/GA vs Goji Labs

Framework / platform R/GA Goji Labs
Figma
Webflow N/A N/A
React N/A
Framer N/A N/A
Adobe Creative Suite N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A N/A
After Effects N/A

Pricing comparison: R/GA vs Goji Labs

Criterion R/GA Goji Labs
Minimum engagement Not published $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Retainer Fixed project, Time & materials
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Mid-market Accessible

Target audience comparison: R/GA vs Goji Labs

Dimension R/GA Goji Labs
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment EdTech, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare
Best use cases Consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch, Enterprise digital product with a marketing or campaign component Nonprofit or mission-driven product design, EdTech or healthtech MVP for an early-stage startup
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

R/GA vs Goji Labs: pros and cons

R/GA
+ Combines product design with marketing and brand strategy under one roof
+ Ten-country footprint spans North America, Europe, Latin America, and Asia-Pacific
+ Nearly five decades of enterprise brand relationships and case studies
+ Independently owned again since its March 2025 buyout, after 23 years inside Interpublic Group
- The 2025 ownership transition to a private-equity-backed independent structure is recent enough to ask about directly
- Marketing-first positioning means less pure product-design specialization than boutiques built around design alone
- Pricing and scale suit large-brand budgets more than early-stage product teams
Goji Labs
+ Independently verified 2025 Inc. 5000 growth recognition
+ 84 Clutch reviews provide a substantial independent feedback sample
+ Explicitly serves nonprofits and individual entrepreneurs, not only funded startups
+ Strategy-led approach pairs product discovery with delivery inside one team
- The 11–50 employee band is smaller than most other boutiques here, limiting capacity for very large programs
- Founding year is disputed between sources (2014 vs. 2015)
- Focus on edtech/fintech/healthtech means less depth for consumer or enterprise-only projects

Who should choose R/GA?

A typical fit: consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch.

Fuses product design with marketing and brand strategy for large platforms, now operating independently for the first time in over two decades. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment.

Who should choose Goji Labs?

A typical fit: nonprofit or mission-driven product design.

A 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly serves nonprofits and entrepreneurs, not only funded startups. Minimum engagement starts at $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in EdTech, Financial services / fintech, Healthcare.

Decision matrix: R/GA vs Goji Labs

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope R/GA
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Check each company's engagement model
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: R/GA (Not published) vs Goji Labs ($15K (per company website; independently unverifiable))
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical R/GA
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: R/GA vs Goji Labs

Use case R/GA fit Goji Labs fit Winner
Consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch Strong Limited R/GA
Enterprise digital product with a marketing or campaign component Strong Limited R/GA
Nonprofit or mission-driven product design Limited Strong Goji Labs
EdTech or healthtech MVP for an early-stage startup Limited Strong Goji Labs
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: R/GA vs Goji Labs

Goji Labs (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly serves nonprofits and entrepreneurs, not only funded startups.

R/GA (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need enterprise digital product with a marketing or campaign component. If your situation matches that, R/GA is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

R/GA vs Goji Labs FAQ

Is R/GA better than Goji Labs?

Goji Labs (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. R/GA's strongest advantage: combines product design with marketing and brand strategy under one roof. Goji Labs's strongest advantage: independently verified 2025 Inc. 5000 growth recognition.

How do R/GA and Goji Labs differ in pricing?

R/GA uses project-based, retainer for ongoing programs pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Goji Labs uses fixed project, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: R/GA or Goji Labs?

R/GA is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between R/GA and Goji Labs?

R/GA's primary differentiator is: fuses product design with marketing and brand strategy for large platforms, now operating independently for the first time in over two decades. Goji Labs's primary differentiator is: a 2025 Inc. 5000 honoree that explicitly serves nonprofits and entrepreneurs, not only funded startups. They also differ in team size (~2,000 vs 11–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs $15K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs EdTech, Financial services / fintech).

Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.