R/GA vs Spaceberry Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
R/GA (3.7/5) edges ahead of Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) overall. R/GA is the better choice for global consumer or enterprise brands that want product design bundled with marketing-led brand strategy.. Spaceberry Studio is the stronger option for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
R/GA vs Spaceberry Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | R/GA | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1977 | 2016 |
| HQ | New York City, NY, USA | Ukraine (also London, UK) |
| Team size | ~2,000 | 12–50 |
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 3.7 / 5 |
| Best for | Global consumer or enterprise brands that want product design bundled with marketing-led brand strategy. | Budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract. |
| Pricing model | Project-based, retainer for ongoing programs | Monthly subscription (dedicated designer) |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, After Effects | Figma, Framer, Webflow |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
R/GA vs Spaceberry Studio: overview
R/GA
R/GA was founded in 1977 in New York City and now operates across ten countries including Austin, London, São Paulo, Singapore, and Stockholm. After 23 years inside Interpublic Group, R/GA completed an independent buyout in March 2025 backed by private equity firm Truelink Capital — a recent structural change worth disclosing. Its differentiator is fusing digital product design with marketing and brand strategy, which shows up in strong enterprise and consumer platform work for large, recognizable brands.
Spaceberry Studio
Spaceberry Studio launched in 2016 as 'MainCode Agency' before rebranding to Spaceberry in 2020; 2016 is used as the founding year since it's the same continuous team and entity. Based in Ukraine with an additional London, UK location, the studio reports 12–50 employees depending on source. It offers subscription-style UI/UX design for SaaS, AI, and mobile apps — one of two subscription comparators in this roster alongside Eleken.
Services and capabilities: R/GA vs Spaceberry Studio
| Capability | R/GA | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: R/GA vs Spaceberry Studio
| Framework / platform | R/GA | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: R/GA vs Spaceberry Studio
| Criterion | R/GA | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer | Subscription |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: R/GA vs Spaceberry Studio
| Dimension | R/GA | Spaceberry Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch, Enterprise digital product with a marketing/campaign component | Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription, AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Subscription |
R/GA vs Spaceberry Studio: pros and cons
| R/GA | |
|---|---|
| + | Combines product design with marketing and brand strategy, useful when a client needs both from one vendor |
| + | Presence in ten countries spans North America, Europe, Latin America, and APAC |
| + | Nearly five decades of case studies and enterprise brand relationships |
| + | Now independently owned following its March 2025 buyout, after 23 years inside Interpublic Group |
| - | Still stabilizing operationally after a recent (2025) private-equity-backed ownership change |
| - | Marketing-first positioning means less pure product-design specialization than boutique studios |
| - | Scale and pricing suit large-brand budgets more than early-stage product teams |
| Spaceberry Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | Subscription pricing (from ~$4.5K/month, per company website; independently unverifiable) is one of the lowest barriers to entry here |
| + | Focused specifically on SaaS, AI, and mobile apps rather than spreading thin across many verticals |
| + | London, UK location adds geographic diversification alongside its Ukraine base |
| + | Continuous operation since 2016, spanning its 2020 rebrand from MainCode Agency |
| - | Smallest reported team-size band (12–50) among the boutiques in this roster, limiting capacity for large programs |
| - | Rebranded from MainCode Agency in 2020, so some pre-2020 case studies may appear under the earlier name |
| - | Subscription-only model may not suit clients preferring a single fixed-price contract with a defined end date |
Who should choose R/GA?
R/GA is the right choice for global consumer or enterprise brands that want product design bundled with marketing-led brand strategy..
Blends product design with marketing and brand strategy in one team, now operating independently after its 2025 buyout from IPG. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products, Media & entertainment.
Who should choose Spaceberry Studio?
Spaceberry Studio is the right choice for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
One of the most accessible entry points in this roster via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. Minimum engagement starts at $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: R/GA vs Spaceberry Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | R/GA |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Check each company's engagement model |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: R/GA (Not published) vs Spaceberry Studio ($4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | R/GA |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: R/GA vs Spaceberry Studio
| Use case | R/GA fit | Spaceberry Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer platform redesign tied to a brand relaunch | Strong | Limited | R/GA |
| Enterprise digital product with a marketing/campaign component | Strong | Limited | R/GA |
| Ongoing SaaS product design on a monthly subscription | Limited | Strong | Spaceberry Studio |
| AI product UI/UX design for a lean startup team | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: R/GA vs Spaceberry Studio
R/GA (3.7/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Blends product design with marketing and brand strategy in one team, now operating independently after its 2025 buyout from IPG. It is best for global consumer or enterprise brands that want product design bundled with marketing-led brand strategy..
Spaceberry Studio (3.7/5) is the better choice when budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract.. If your situation matches those criteria, Spaceberry Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
R/GA vs Spaceberry Studio FAQ
Is R/GA better than Spaceberry Studio?
R/GA (3.7/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. R/GA is better for global consumer or enterprise brands that want product design bundled with marketing-led brand strategy.. Spaceberry Studio is better for budget-conscious SaaS, AI, and mobile app teams wanting a lower-commitment monthly subscription instead of a large fixed-price contract..
How do R/GA and Spaceberry Studio differ in pricing?
R/GA uses project-based, retainer for ongoing programs pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Spaceberry Studio uses monthly subscription (dedicated designer) pricing with a minimum engagement of $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: R/GA or Spaceberry Studio?
R/GA is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between R/GA and Spaceberry Studio?
R/GA's primary differentiator is: blends product design with marketing and brand strategy in one team, now operating independently after its 2025 buyout from ipg. Spaceberry Studio's primary differentiator is: one of the most accessible entry points in this roster via a subscription model rather than a large upfront fixed-price contract. They also differ in team size (~2,000 vs 12–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs $4.5K/month (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Consumer products vs SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.