Top Product Design Agencies

UXDA vs Halo Lab: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

Halo Lab (4.4/5) edges ahead of UXDA (4.3/5) overall. Halo Lab is the better choice for E-commerce, web apps — #1 Dribbble-ranked studio. UXDA is the stronger option for Banks, fintech — exclusively financial-services UX. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

UXDA vs Halo Lab: head-to-head summary

Criterion UXDA Halo Lab
Founded 2015 2014
HQ Riga, Latvia Multiple offices across 3 time zones (Ukraine-rooted)
Team size 25+ 130+
Rating 4.3 / 5 4.4 / 5
Primary differentiator The only studio in this roster built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries Currently the #1-ranked Dribbble Team globally, backed by 70+ design awards and a 4.9 Clutch rating
Pricing model Fixed project, retainer Fixed project, dedicated team
Min. engagement $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Primary tech stack Figma, Sketch, Design systems/Storybook Figma, Webflow, React
Industries served Financial services / fintech SaaS / B2B software, E-commerce / retail, Consumer products

UXDA vs Halo Lab: overview

UXDA

Alex Kreger co-founded UXDA (Financial UX Design) in 2015, building a deliberately narrow 25-person team from Riga, Latvia. A decade later, UXDA has shaped or governed 150+ banking and fintech digital platforms in 39 countries — a level of single-vertical repetition none of the generalists in this list can claim, since there's no branding or consumer-product work on offer. Every engagement here is financial-services UX.

Halo Lab

Halo Lab doesn't publish a precise founding date; the studio's own claim of "12 years" of experience as of 2026 implies a start around 2014. What's verifiable is the scale and recognition: 130+ people across multiple offices in three time zones, Ukraine-rooted, holding a 4.9 Clutch rating, 70+ design awards, and — currently — the #1 spot on Dribbble's global team rankings, a running signal of visual design quality that's harder to fake than a one-time award.

Services and capabilities: UXDA vs Halo Lab

Capability UXDA Halo Lab
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: UXDA vs Halo Lab

Framework / platform UXDA Halo Lab
Figma
Webflow N/A
React N/A
Framer N/A N/A
Adobe Creative Suite N/A N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A
After Effects N/A

Pricing comparison: UXDA vs Halo Lab

Criterion UXDA Halo Lab
Minimum engagement $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)
Engagement models Fixed project, Retainer Fixed project, Dedicated team
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Accessible Accessible

Target audience comparison: UXDA vs Halo Lab

Dimension UXDA Halo Lab
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Financial services / fintech SaaS / B2B software, E-commerce / retail, Consumer products
Best use cases Bank digital platform redesign, Fintech app UX for a regulated market E-commerce platform redesign, Marketing site plus product design bundle
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

UXDA vs Halo Lab: pros and cons

UXDA
+ Exclusive financial-services focus builds domain expertise generalist studios simply can't match
+ 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries over a decade
+ Small, senior 25+ team keeps client relationships direct rather than layered through account management
+ A decade of continuous, single-vertical operation compounds domain knowledge over time
- The exclusive fintech focus is a real limitation for any client outside financial services
- $30K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) runs higher than most 25-person boutiques
- Small team size (25+) caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs
Halo Lab
+ Currently the #1-ranked Dribbble Team globally — an independently observable, ongoing quality signal
+ 70+ design awards and a 4.9 Clutch rating make it one of the most consistently recognized studios here
+ 130+ person team spans multiple offices and three time zones, supporting larger programs
+ Broad service coverage from complex web apps through marketing sites, e-commerce, and mobile
- Exact founding year isn't confirmed — the '12 years as of 2026' claim implies ~2014 but isn't independently verified
- Ukraine-rooted origins carry the same regional-continuity considerations as other studios in this list
- Its broad service range trades some singular specialization against fintech- or research-focused boutiques

Who should choose UXDA?

A typical fit: bank digital platform redesign.

The only studio in this roster built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Minimum engagement starts at $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech.

Who should choose Halo Lab?

A typical fit: e-commerce platform redesign.

Currently the #1-ranked Dribbble Team globally, backed by 70+ design awards and a 4.9 Clutch rating. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, E-commerce / retail, Consumer products.

Decision matrix: UXDA vs Halo Lab

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope UXDA
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Halo Lab
Your budget is at the lower end Halo Lab
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical Halo Lab
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: UXDA vs Halo Lab

Use case UXDA fit Halo Lab fit Winner
Bank digital platform redesign Strong Limited UXDA
Fintech app UX for a regulated market Strong Limited UXDA
E-commerce platform redesign Limited Strong Halo Lab
Marketing site plus product design bundle Limited Strong Halo Lab
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: UXDA vs Halo Lab

Halo Lab (4.4/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. Currently the #1-ranked Dribbble Team globally, backed by 70+ design awards and a 4.9 Clutch rating.

UXDA (4.3/5) is worth a look if you need fintech app UX for a regulated market. If your situation matches that, UXDA is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

UXDA vs Halo Lab FAQ

Is UXDA better than Halo Lab?

Halo Lab (4.4/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. UXDA's strongest advantage: exclusive financial-services focus builds domain expertise generalist studios simply can't match. Halo Lab's strongest advantage: currently the #1-ranked Dribbble Team globally — an independently observable, ongoing quality signal.

How do UXDA and Halo Lab differ in pricing?

UXDA uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of $30K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Halo Lab uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: UXDA or Halo Lab?

Halo Lab is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between UXDA and Halo Lab?

UXDA's primary differentiator is: the only studio in this roster built exclusively around financial-services UX, with 150+ banking and fintech platforms shaped across 39 countries. Halo Lab's primary differentiator is: currently the #1-ranked Dribbble Team globally, backed by 70+ design awards and a 4.9 Clutch rating. They also differ in team size (25+ vs 130+), minimum engagement ($30K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech vs SaaS / B2B software, E-commerce / retail).

Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.