Top Product Design Agencies

ANML vs The Gradient: full comparison for 2026

Quick verdict

The Gradient (4.2/5) edges ahead of ANML (3.8/5) overall. The Gradient is the better choice for Fintech, healthcare, retail — AI-native, limited roster for senior attention. ANML is the stronger option for B2B, healthcare, AI startups — tiny senior team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.

ANML vs The Gradient: head-to-head summary

Criterion ANML The Gradient
Founded 2012 2016
HQ Silicon Valley, CA, USA Lviv, Ukraine
Team size ~10 (per LinkedIn) 11–50
Rating 3.8 / 5 4.2 / 5
Primary differentiator One of the smallest teams in this roster, giving clients the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work A deliberately small, AI-native studio with a notable client list (Qatar Airways, Philips, Daimler AG) unusual for its self-limited scale
Pricing model Fixed project Fixed project, retainer
Min. engagement Not published Not published
Primary tech stack Figma, Sketch Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, Design systems/Storybook
Industries served Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, E-commerce / retail

ANML vs The Gradient: overview

ANML

ANML (Animal) launched in 2012 and has stayed genuinely small — LinkedIn lists roughly 10 employees — while operating out of Silicon Valley. That size is the point: the studio positions itself as a boutique UI/UX design shop where clients work directly with senior people, concentrated specifically on B2B, healthcare, and AI engagements rather than spreading across unrelated verticals.

The Gradient

The Gradient doesn't publish a confirmed founding year, though its 55 Clutch reviews imply several years of delivery history; 2016 is used here as an estimate consistent with the studio's stated track record. Based in Lviv, Ukraine, the team stays intentionally small — 11–50 people — a limit the studio frames as necessary to keep senior attention on every engagement rather than scaling into account-management layers. Client names include Qatar Airways, Philips, Daimler AG, and Dubai Financial Market, a notably strong list for a studio this size, built around an explicitly AI-native design practice.

Services and capabilities: ANML vs The Gradient

Capability ANML The Gradient
Product design
UX research
Branding
Web development
Mobile development
Design systems

Tech stack comparison: ANML vs The Gradient

Framework / platform ANML The Gradient
Figma
Webflow N/A N/A
React N/A N/A
Framer N/A N/A
Adobe Creative Suite N/A
Design systems/Storybook N/A
After Effects N/A N/A

Pricing comparison: ANML vs The Gradient

Criterion ANML The Gradient
Minimum engagement Not published Not published
Engagement models Fixed project Fixed project, Retainer
Rate transparency Minimum disclosed Minimum disclosed
Price tier Mid-market Mid-market

Target audience comparison: ANML vs The Gradient

Dimension ANML The Gradient
Best company size Startup to mid-market Startup to mid-market
Best industries Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, E-commerce / retail
Best use cases B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team, Healthcare product UX with a boutique studio AI-native product design for a fintech or healthcare platform, Retail digital product design for an established brand
Typical project type Fixed project Fixed project

ANML vs The Gradient: pros and cons

ANML
+ 13 years of continuous operation since 2012
+ A roughly 10-person team means direct access to senior designers on every project
+ Focused specifically on B2B, healthcare, and AI rather than spreading across unrelated verticals
+ Boutique scale keeps overhead — and likely pricing — lower than mid-size studios
- A ~10-person team caps capacity for large or multi-workstream programs
- Minimum engagement isn't published, so budget planning requires a direct conversation
- Small scale means less multi-region delivery capacity than larger studios on this list
The Gradient
+ Notable client list (Qatar Airways, Philips, Daimler AG, Dubai Financial Market) is strong for a deliberately small studio
+ AI-native positioning is a genuine differentiator versus generalist product design shops
+ Deliberately limits its client roster, which the studio frames as preserving senior attention per project
+ 55 Clutch reviews imply a substantial track record despite the unconfirmed founding year
- Founding year is not confirmed in available sources beyond an implied multi-year track record
- Deliberately small team (11–50) by design limits capacity for very large or multi-workstream programs
- Minimum engagement is not published, requiring a direct conversation for budget planning

Who should choose ANML?

A typical fit: B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team.

One of the smallest teams in this roster, giving clients the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software.

Who should choose The Gradient?

A typical fit: AI-native product design for a fintech or healthcare platform.

A deliberately small, AI-native studio with a notable client list (Qatar Airways, Philips, Daimler AG) unusual for its self-limited scale. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, Healthcare, E-commerce / retail.

Decision matrix: ANML vs The Gradient

Your situation Recommended choice
You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope ANML
You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme Check each company's engagement model
Your budget is at the lower end Compare: ANML (Not published) vs The Gradient (Not published)
You need specialist depth in a specific vertical The Gradient
You need staff augmentation or team extension Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug
You need consulting before committing to a build Both may offer discovery engagements

Use case fit: ANML vs The Gradient

Use case ANML fit The Gradient fit Winner
B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team Strong Limited ANML
Healthcare product UX with a boutique studio Strong Strong Both equally
AI-native product design for a fintech or healthcare platform Limited Strong The Gradient
Retail digital product design for an established brand Limited Strong The Gradient
Fixed-price product build Limited Limited Both equally
Dedicated design team augmentation Limited Limited Both equally

Verdict: ANML vs The Gradient

The Gradient (4.2/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A deliberately small, AI-native studio with a notable client list (Qatar Airways, Philips, Daimler AG) unusual for its self-limited scale.

ANML (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need healthcare product UX with a boutique studio. If your situation matches that, ANML is a competitive option.

Related comparisons

ANML vs The Gradient FAQ

Is ANML better than The Gradient?

The Gradient (4.2/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. ANML's strongest advantage: 13 years of continuous operation since 2012. The Gradient's strongest advantage: notable client list (Qatar Airways, Philips, Daimler AG, Dubai Financial Market) is strong for a deliberately small studio.

How do ANML and The Gradient differ in pricing?

ANML uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. The Gradient uses fixed project, retainer pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.

Which is better for enterprise: ANML or The Gradient?

The Gradient is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.

What are the main differences between ANML and The Gradient?

ANML's primary differentiator is: one of the smallest teams in this roster, giving clients the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work. The Gradient's primary differentiator is: a deliberately small, AI-native studio with a notable client list (Qatar Airways, Philips, Daimler AG) unusual for its self-limited scale. They also differ in team size (~10 (per LinkedIn) vs 11–50), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software vs Financial services / fintech, Healthcare).

Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.