EPAM Continuum vs Excited: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Excited (4.6/5) edges ahead of EPAM Continuum (3.7/5) overall. Excited is the better choice for SaaS/fintech teams, Clutch-ranked specialist, accessible rates. EPAM Continuum is the stronger option for Enterprises, design integrated with strategy and engineering. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
EPAM Continuum vs Excited: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | EPAM Continuum | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 1983 | 2018 |
| HQ | Boston, MA, USA | Lviv, Ukraine |
| Team size | Not published (operates within EPAM's global engineering workforce) | 100+ |
| Rating | 3.7 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | Carries Continuum's decades-old industrial-design pedigree (the Reebok Pump) into EPAM's enterprise software engineering scale | A sustained Top 5 global UX agency ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity |
| Pricing model | Enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Adobe Creative Suite, Design systems/Storybook | Figma, Framer, After Effects |
| Industries served | Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Consumer products | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech |
EPAM Continuum vs Excited: overview
EPAM Continuum
Continuum's design pedigree predates most of the firms on this list — Gianfranco Zaccai founded it in Boston in 1983, and the studio went on to shape landmark industrial-design work including the Reebok Pump. EPAM Systems acquired Continuum in 2018, folding it into what's now EPAM Continuum, a practice that fuses strategy, design, and engineering rather than treating design as a standalone deliverable. That combination — decades-old industrial-design credibility running inside a large enterprise software engineering consultancy — is unusual among the names in this list.
Excited
Excited opened in Lviv, Ukraine in 2018 and has grown to 100+ designers while holding a consistent spot among Clutch's Top 5 UX agencies worldwide — a repeated ranking, not a one-time placement. About 70% of its Clutch reviewers specifically call out quality and creativity, an unusually pointed signal for review data. The agency deliberately narrows its focus to SaaS and fintech clients, covering UX/UI, product design, branding, and motion design, with delivery experience across 20+ countries.
Services and capabilities: EPAM Continuum vs Excited
| Capability | EPAM Continuum | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✗ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✓ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: EPAM Continuum vs Excited
| Framework / platform | EPAM Continuum | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | N/A | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | ✓ |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | ✓ | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: EPAM Continuum vs Excited
| Criterion | EPAM Continuum | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Retainer, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: EPAM Continuum vs Excited
| Dimension | EPAM Continuum | Excited |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Consumer products | SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech |
| Best use cases | Enterprise product design bundled with large-scale software engineering delivery, Legacy industrial-design-adjacent hardware-software product programs | SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company, Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
EPAM Continuum vs Excited: pros and cons
| EPAM Continuum | |
|---|---|
| + | Decades of design pedigree predating most agencies on this list, including landmark industrial-design work |
| + | Integrates strategy, design, and engineering rather than treating design as a standalone deliverable |
| + | Backed by EPAM's much larger global technology-consulting and engineering bench |
| + | Long operating history gives it enterprise case studies across multiple industries |
| - | Acquired into EPAM Systems in 2018 — no longer an independent design consultancy |
| - | Consultancy scale and pricing are less accessible to startups than boutique studios |
| - | Design work here comes bundled with broader technology consulting rather than offered as a standalone service |
| Excited | |
|---|---|
| + | Sustained Top 5 UX agency ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement |
| + | About 70% of Clutch reviewers specifically cite quality and creativity, a strong qualitative signal |
| + | Purpose-built around SaaS and fintech, giving real vertical depth |
| + | Delivery experience across 20+ countries demonstrates broad operational reach |
| - | The claimed 15M+ user reach figure is self-reported and independently unverifiable |
| - | Ukraine-based team carries the same regional-continuity considerations as other Ukraine-rooted studios |
| - | SaaS/fintech specialization means less fit outside those two verticals |
Who should choose EPAM Continuum?
A typical fit: enterprise product design bundled with large-scale software engineering delivery.
Carries Continuum's decades-old industrial-design pedigree (the Reebok Pump) into EPAM's enterprise software engineering scale. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Healthcare, Consumer products.
Who should choose Excited?
A typical fit: SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company.
A sustained Top 5 global UX agency ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech.
Decision matrix: EPAM Continuum vs Excited
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | EPAM Continuum |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | EPAM Continuum |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: EPAM Continuum (Not published) vs Excited ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | EPAM Continuum |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: EPAM Continuum vs Excited
| Use case | EPAM Continuum fit | Excited fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise product design bundled with large-scale software engineering delivery | Strong | Limited | EPAM Continuum |
| Legacy industrial-design-adjacent hardware-software product programs | Strong | Limited | EPAM Continuum |
| SaaS product redesign for a growth-stage company | Limited | Strong | Excited |
| Fintech UX/UI overhaul with motion design polish | Limited | Strong | Excited |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: EPAM Continuum vs Excited
Excited (4.6/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A sustained Top 5 global UX agency ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity.
EPAM Continuum (3.7/5) is worth a look if you need legacy industrial-design-adjacent hardware-software product programs. If your situation matches that, EPAM Continuum is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
EPAM Continuum vs Excited FAQ
Is EPAM Continuum better than Excited?
Excited (4.6/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. EPAM Continuum's strongest advantage: decades of design pedigree predating most agencies on this list, including landmark industrial-design work. Excited's strongest advantage: sustained Top 5 UX agency ranking worldwide by Clutch, not a one-off placement.
How do EPAM Continuum and Excited differ in pricing?
EPAM Continuum uses enterprise consulting engagement (project-based or retainer) pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Excited uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: EPAM Continuum or Excited?
Excited is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between EPAM Continuum and Excited?
EPAM Continuum's primary differentiator is: carries Continuum's decades-old industrial-design pedigree (the Reebok Pump) into EPAM's enterprise software engineering scale. Excited's primary differentiator is: a sustained Top 5 global UX agency ranking on Clutch, with about 70% of reviews specifically citing quality and creativity. They also differ in team size (Not published (operates within EPAM's global engineering workforce) vs 100+), minimum engagement (Not published vs $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (Enterprise transformation, Healthcare vs SaaS / B2B software, Financial services / fintech).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.