Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Fireart Studio (4.4/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for Fintech, SaaS, healthcare — 5.0-rated boutique, deep track record. Fireart Studio is the stronger option for Startups, mid-market — design plus full development, one studio. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Fireart Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| HQ | Warsaw, Poland (Ukraine-founded roots) | Dnipro, Ukraine |
| Team size | 100–150+ | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) |
| Rating | 4.4 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients, backed by Clutch's independently verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition | A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team, T&M | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, Webflow, After Effects |
| Industries served | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail |
Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio: overview
Fireart Studio
Fireart Studio began in 2013 with Ukrainian roots and now runs out of Warsaw, Poland, having scaled from a single founder to 150+ people over a decade. The studio's track record — 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients — earned it Clutch's "Leading UX Design Team" recognition, plus Top Graphic Design Company nods from DesignRush and The Manifest. Fireart pairs product design with full software development, so clients get one vendor for both rather than stitching design and engineering together themselves.
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes its own history as running "since 2014" — treated here as self-reported since it's not independently confirmed — from a base in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than stating a team size, the studio calls itself a "collective of creative professionals," pointing instead to 500+ completed projects and a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews. Thirteen-plus international awards from Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush back the rating, and the studio's client work spans fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail.
Services and capabilities: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Capability | Fireart Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✓ | ✗ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✓ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Framework / platform | Fireart Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | ✓ |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | ✓ | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | ✓ |
Pricing comparison: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Criterion | Fireart Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team, Time & materials | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Dimension | Fireart Studio | Gapsy Studio |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare |
| Best use cases | End-to-end SaaS product design and development, Startup MVP design and build | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio: pros and cons
| Fireart Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years is one of the deepest track records among the boutiques here |
| + | Clutch's 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition, plus Top Graphic Design Company nods from DesignRush and The Manifest |
| + | Scaled from a single founder to 150+ people while keeping a single-studio, boutique culture |
| + | Pairs product design with full software development under one vendor |
| - | Relocated its HQ from Ukraine to Warsaw amid regional instability — worth asking about for delivery continuity |
| - | $20K minimum engagement (per company website; independently unverifiable) sits mid-tier among boutiques here |
| - | Development-heavy focus trades off some pure design specialization against research-only studios |
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this roster |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
Who should choose Fireart Studio?
A typical fit: end-to-end SaaS product design and development.
700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients, backed by Clutch's independently verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition. Minimum engagement starts at $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products.
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
A typical fit: fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work.
A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Decision matrix: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Fireart Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Fireart Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Gapsy Studio |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
| Use case | Fireart Studio fit | Gapsy Studio fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| End-to-end SaaS product design and development | Strong | Limited | Fireart Studio |
| Startup MVP design and build | Strong | Limited | Fireart Studio |
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Limited | Strong | Gapsy Studio |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Limited | Strong | Gapsy Studio |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount.
Fireart Studio (4.4/5) is worth a look if you need startup MVP design and build. If your situation matches that, Fireart Studio is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Fireart Studio vs Gapsy Studio FAQ
Is Fireart Studio better than Gapsy Studio?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Fireart Studio's strongest advantage: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients over 12 years is one of the deepest track records among the boutiques here. Gapsy Studio's strongest advantage: 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this roster.
How do Fireart Studio and Gapsy Studio differ in pricing?
Fireart Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team, t&m pricing with a minimum engagement of $20K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Fireart Studio or Gapsy Studio?
Fireart Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Fireart Studio and Gapsy Studio?
Fireart Studio's primary differentiator is: 700+ delivered projects for 200+ clients, backed by Clutch's independently verified 'Leading UX Design Team' recognition. Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount. They also differ in team size (100–150+ vs Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects)), minimum engagement ($20K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)), and primary industries served (SaaS / B2B software, Consumer products vs Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.