Gapsy Studio vs Fresh Tilled Soil: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of Fresh Tilled Soil (3.9/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for Fintech, SaaS, healthcare — 5.0-rated boutique, deep track record. Fresh Tilled Soil is the stronger option for Mid-market, enterprise — long-tenured Boston UX boutique. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Gapsy Studio vs Fresh Tilled Soil: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | Fresh Tilled Soil |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2005 |
| HQ | Dnipro, Ukraine | Boston, MA, USA |
| Team size | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) | 11–50 |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 3.9 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount | 700+ delivered projects over two decades from a compact 11–50 person team, now operating inside the ADK Group |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project |
| Min. engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, After Effects | Figma, Sketch, React |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products |
Gapsy Studio vs Fresh Tilled Soil: overview
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes its own history as running "since 2014" — treated here as self-reported since it's not independently confirmed — from a base in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than stating a team size, the studio calls itself a "collective of creative professionals," pointing instead to 500+ completed projects and a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews. Thirteen-plus international awards from Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush back the rating, and the studio's client work spans fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail.
Fresh Tilled Soil
Fresh Tilled Soil opened in Boston in 2005, building a UX/UI design and front-end development practice with clients including FedEx, GE, Titleist, and Boston Private Bank across more than 700 projects. In 2020 the firm joined ADK Group, operating today as "Fresh Tilled Soil, an ADK Group Company" — a detail worth knowing since it's no longer fully independent. The team stays compact at 11–50 people, keeping the studio boutique in feel even inside a larger group structure.
Services and capabilities: Gapsy Studio vs Fresh Tilled Soil
| Capability | Gapsy Studio | Fresh Tilled Soil |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Gapsy Studio vs Fresh Tilled Soil
| Framework / platform | Gapsy Studio | Fresh Tilled Soil |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | ✓ |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | ✓ |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Gapsy Studio vs Fresh Tilled Soil
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | Fresh Tilled Soil |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Gapsy Studio vs Fresh Tilled Soil
| Dimension | Gapsy Studio | Fresh Tilled Soil |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare | Enterprise transformation, Consumer products |
| Best use cases | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | UX/UI redesign for a mid-market or enterprise brand, Front-end development paired with UX design for an existing product |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Gapsy Studio vs Fresh Tilled Soil: pros and cons
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this roster |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
| Fresh Tilled Soil | |
|---|---|
| + | 700+ delivered projects since 2005 across a named client list including FedEx and GE |
| + | Two decades of continuous operation under the same brand |
| + | Compact 11–50 person team keeps client relationships direct |
| + | ADK Group membership since 2020 adds access to a broader group's resources |
| - | No longer fully independent — operates as part of ADK Group since 2020 |
| - | An 11–50 person team caps capacity for very large, multi-workstream programs |
| - | Pricing and minimum engagement size aren't published |
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
A typical fit: fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work.
A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Who should choose Fresh Tilled Soil?
A typical fit: UX/UI redesign for a mid-market or enterprise brand.
700+ delivered projects over two decades from a compact 11–50 person team, now operating inside the ADK Group. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Enterprise transformation, Consumer products.
Decision matrix: Gapsy Studio vs Fresh Tilled Soil
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Gapsy Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Gapsy Studio ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) vs Fresh Tilled Soil (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Gapsy Studio vs Fresh Tilled Soil
| Use case | Gapsy Studio fit | Fresh Tilled Soil fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| UX/UI redesign for a mid-market or enterprise brand | Limited | Strong | Fresh Tilled Soil |
| Front-end development paired with UX design for an existing product | Limited | Strong | Fresh Tilled Soil |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Gapsy Studio vs Fresh Tilled Soil
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount.
Fresh Tilled Soil (3.9/5) is worth a look if you need front-end development paired with UX design for an existing product. If your situation matches that, Fresh Tilled Soil is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Gapsy Studio vs Fresh Tilled Soil FAQ
Is Gapsy Studio better than Fresh Tilled Soil?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Gapsy Studio's strongest advantage: 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this roster. Fresh Tilled Soil's strongest advantage: 700+ delivered projects since 2005 across a named client list including FedEx and GE.
How do Gapsy Studio and Fresh Tilled Soil differ in pricing?
Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Fresh Tilled Soil uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Gapsy Studio or Fresh Tilled Soil?
Fresh Tilled Soil is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Gapsy Studio and Fresh Tilled Soil?
Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount. Fresh Tilled Soil's primary differentiator is: 700+ delivered projects over two decades from a compact 11–50 person team, now operating inside the ADK Group. They also differ in team size (Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) vs 11–50), minimum engagement ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software vs Enterprise transformation, Consumer products).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.