Work & Co vs ANML: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Work & Co (3.9/5) edges ahead of ANML (3.8/5) overall. Work & Co is the better choice for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering.. ANML is the stronger option for b2B, healthcare, and AI startups wanting a very small, senior team rather than a larger studio.. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs ANML: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | United States (specific city not published) |
| Team size | 425+ | ~10 (per LinkedIn) |
| Rating | 3.9 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Best for | Premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering. | B2B, healthcare, and AI startups wanting a very small, senior team rather than a larger studio. |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, Sketch |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software |
Work & Co vs ANML: overview
Work & Co
Work & Co was founded in May 2013 by Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo, and is based in Dumbo, Brooklyn with offices spanning the US, Latin America, and Europe. Its client list — Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney — is unusually strong for a 425-person studio, reflecting its engineering-heavy delivery model where design and front-end build happen under one roof. Work & Co is now part of Accenture Song, an ownership detail worth disclosing alongside its design credentials.
ANML
ANML (Animal) was founded in 2012. Its HQ isn't explicitly published in available sources, so it is treated here as a US-based boutique without stating a specific city. Team size is genuinely small — one source cites 10 employees on LinkedIn — and the agency positions itself as a boutique UI/UX design shop concentrated on B2B, healthcare, and AI clients.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs ANML
| Capability | Work & Co | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs ANML
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs ANML
| Criterion | Work & Co | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs ANML
| Dimension | Work & Co | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team, Healthcare product UX with a boutique studio |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Work & Co vs ANML: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client roster (Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney) punches well above the studio's headcount |
| + | Design and engineering under one roof reduces the hand-off risk of splitting vendors |
| + | 425+ people across the US, Europe, and Latin America give real multi-region delivery capacity |
| + | Consistent track record shipping flagship consumer digital products |
| - | Now part of Accenture Song, which shares a parent with the Accenture Song entry elsewhere in this roster |
| - | Its premium client base implies premium pricing even though no minimum is published |
| - | Less vertical specialization (fintech, healthcare-specific) than boutiques built around one niche |
| ANML | |
|---|---|
| + | 13 years of continuous operation since 2012 |
| + | Very small (~10 person) team means direct access to senior designers on every project |
| + | Focused specifically on B2B, healthcare, and AI rather than spreading across unrelated verticals |
| + | Boutique scale keeps overhead — and likely pricing — lower than mid-size studios |
| - | HQ city is not explicitly published in available sources, making delivery-location verification harder |
| - | A ~10-person team caps capacity for large or multi-workstream programs |
| - | Minimum engagement is not published, so budget planning requires a direct conversation |
Who should choose Work & Co?
Work & Co is the right choice for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering..
An engineering-led delivery model backing a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its headcount. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose ANML?
ANML is the right choice for b2B, healthcare, and AI startups wanting a very small, senior team rather than a larger studio..
One of the smallest teams in this roster, offering the most senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs ANML
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs ANML (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs ANML
| Use case | Work & Co fit | ANML fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild with heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team | Limited | Strong | ANML |
| Healthcare product UX with a boutique studio | Limited | Strong | ANML |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs ANML
Work & Co (3.9/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. An engineering-led delivery model backing a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) unusually strong for its headcount. It is best for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering..
ANML (3.8/5) is the better choice when b2B, healthcare, and AI startups wanting a very small, senior team rather than a larger studio.. If your situation matches those criteria, ANML is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs ANML FAQ
Is Work & Co better than ANML?
Work & Co (3.9/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co is better for premium consumer and enterprise brands wanting design paired tightly with production-grade front-end engineering.. ANML is better for b2B, healthcare, and AI startups wanting a very small, senior team rather than a larger studio..
How do Work & Co and ANML differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. ANML uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or ANML?
Work & Co is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and ANML?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: an engineering-led delivery model backing a client roster (apple, ikea, nike, disney) unusually strong for its headcount. ANML's primary differentiator is: one of the smallest teams in this roster, offering the most senior-to-client ratio for b2b, healthcare, and ai work. They also differ in team size (425+ vs ~10 (per LinkedIn)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.