Work & Co vs ANML: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Work & Co (3.8/5) edges ahead of ANML (3.8/5) overall. Work & Co is the better choice for premium brands, design paired with production-grade engineering. ANML is the stronger option for B2B, healthcare, AI startups — tiny senior team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Work & Co vs ANML: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Work & Co | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| HQ | Dumbo, Brooklyn, NY, USA | Silicon Valley, CA, USA |
| Team size | 425+ | ~10 (per LinkedIn) |
| Rating | 3.8 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) that outsizes its ~425-person headcount, delivered through an engineering-heavy design-and-build model | One of the smallest teams in this roster, giving clients the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project |
| Min. engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, React, Next.js | Figma, Sketch |
| Industries served | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software |
Work & Co vs ANML: overview
Work & Co
Five co-founders — Gene Liebel, Felipe Memoria, Joe Stewart, Mohan Ramaswamy, and Marcelo Eduardo — launched Work & Co from Dumbo, Brooklyn in May 2013. The studio has since added offices across the US, Latin America, and Europe, but headcount (roughly 425) hasn't grown to match its client list: Apple, IKEA, Google, Mercedes-Benz, Pfizer, GoFundMe, Nike, and Disney have all hired this team. Its engineering-heavy delivery model — design and front-end build under one roof — is a large part of why. Work & Co joined Accenture Song in 2023.
ANML
ANML (Animal) launched in 2012 and has stayed genuinely small — LinkedIn lists roughly 10 employees — while operating out of Silicon Valley. That size is the point: the studio positions itself as a boutique UI/UX design shop where clients work directly with senior people, concentrated specifically on B2B, healthcare, and AI engagements rather than spreading across unrelated verticals.
Services and capabilities: Work & Co vs ANML
| Capability | Work & Co | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✗ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Work & Co vs ANML
| Framework / platform | Work & Co | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | N/A | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | N/A | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Work & Co vs ANML
| Criterion | Work & Co | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | Not published | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Mid-market | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Work & Co vs ANML
| Dimension | Work & Co | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare | Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software |
| Best use cases | Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand, E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team, Healthcare product UX with a boutique studio |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Work & Co vs ANML: pros and cons
| Work & Co | |
|---|---|
| + | Client roster (Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney) is exceptional relative to a ~425-person studio |
| + | Engineering-heavy delivery keeps design and build under one roof, reducing hand-off risk |
| + | Offices across the US, Europe, and Latin America support genuine multi-region delivery |
| + | Consistent track record shipping flagship consumer digital products |
| - | Now part of Accenture Song, sharing a parent with the Accenture Song listing elsewhere on this site |
| - | Its premium client base implies premium pricing, though no minimum is published |
| - | Less vertical specialization in fintech or healthcare than boutiques built around a single niche |
| ANML | |
|---|---|
| + | 13 years of continuous operation since 2012 |
| + | A roughly 10-person team means direct access to senior designers on every project |
| + | Focused specifically on B2B, healthcare, and AI rather than spreading across unrelated verticals |
| + | Boutique scale keeps overhead — and likely pricing — lower than mid-size studios |
| - | A ~10-person team caps capacity for large or multi-workstream programs |
| - | Minimum engagement isn't published, so budget planning requires a direct conversation |
| - | Small scale means less multi-region delivery capacity than larger studios on this list |
Who should choose Work & Co?
A typical fit: flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand.
A client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) that outsizes its ~425-person headcount, delivered through an engineering-heavy design-and-build model. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Consumer products, Enterprise transformation, Healthcare.
Who should choose ANML?
A typical fit: B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team.
One of the smallest teams in this roster, giving clients the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software.
Decision matrix: Work & Co vs ANML
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Work & Co |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Work & Co |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Work & Co (Not published) vs ANML (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Work & Co |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Work & Co vs ANML
| Use case | Work & Co fit | ANML fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagship consumer app redesign for a global brand | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| E-commerce platform rebuild requiring heavy front-end engineering | Strong | Limited | Work & Co |
| B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team | Limited | Strong | ANML |
| Healthcare product UX with a boutique studio | Limited | Strong | ANML |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Work & Co vs ANML
Work & Co (3.8/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) that outsizes its ~425-person headcount, delivered through an engineering-heavy design-and-build model.
ANML (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need healthcare product UX with a boutique studio. If your situation matches that, ANML is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Work & Co vs ANML FAQ
Is Work & Co better than ANML?
Work & Co (3.8/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Work & Co's strongest advantage: client roster (Apple, IKEA, Google, Nike, Disney) is exceptional relative to a ~425-person studio. ANML's strongest advantage: 13 years of continuous operation since 2012.
How do Work & Co and ANML differ in pricing?
Work & Co uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. ANML uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Work & Co or ANML?
Work & Co is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Work & Co and ANML?
Work & Co's primary differentiator is: a client roster (Apple, IKEA, Nike, Disney) that outsizes its ~425-person headcount, delivered through an engineering-heavy design-and-build model. ANML's primary differentiator is: one of the smallest teams in this roster, giving clients the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work. They also differ in team size (425+ vs ~10 (per LinkedIn)), minimum engagement (Not published vs Not published), and primary industries served (Consumer products, Enterprise transformation vs Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.