Gapsy Studio vs ANML: full comparison for 2026
Quick verdict
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) edges ahead of ANML (3.8/5) overall. Gapsy Studio is the better choice for Fintech, SaaS, healthcare — 5.0-rated boutique, deep track record. ANML is the stronger option for B2B, healthcare, AI startups — tiny senior team. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Gapsy Studio vs ANML: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2014 | 2012 |
| HQ | Dnipro, Ukraine | Silicon Valley, CA, USA |
| Team size | Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) | ~10 (per LinkedIn) |
| Rating | 4.5 / 5 | 3.8 / 5 |
| Primary differentiator | A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount | One of the smallest teams in this roster, giving clients the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project |
| Min. engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Primary tech stack | Figma, Webflow, After Effects | Figma, Sketch |
| Industries served | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail | Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software |
Gapsy Studio vs ANML: overview
Gapsy Studio
Gapsy Studio describes its own history as running "since 2014" — treated here as self-reported since it's not independently confirmed — from a base in Dnipro, Ukraine. Rather than stating a team size, the studio calls itself a "collective of creative professionals," pointing instead to 500+ completed projects and a 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews. Thirteen-plus international awards from Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush back the rating, and the studio's client work spans fintech, SaaS, health, education, and retail.
ANML
ANML (Animal) launched in 2012 and has stayed genuinely small — LinkedIn lists roughly 10 employees — while operating out of Silicon Valley. That size is the point: the studio positions itself as a boutique UI/UX design shop where clients work directly with senior people, concentrated specifically on B2B, healthcare, and AI engagements rather than spreading across unrelated verticals.
Services and capabilities: Gapsy Studio vs ANML
| Capability | Gapsy Studio | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Product design | ✓ | ✓ |
| UX research | ✗ | ✓ |
| Branding | ✓ | ✗ |
| Web development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Mobile development | ✓ | ✗ |
| Design systems | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Gapsy Studio vs ANML
| Framework / platform | Gapsy Studio | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Figma | ✓ | ✓ |
| Webflow | ✓ | N/A |
| React | ✓ | N/A |
| Framer | N/A | N/A |
| Adobe Creative Suite | N/A | N/A |
| Design systems/Storybook | N/A | N/A |
| After Effects | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Gapsy Studio vs ANML
| Criterion | Gapsy Studio | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) | Not published |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Mid-market |
Target audience comparison: Gapsy Studio vs ANML
| Dimension | Gapsy Studio | ANML |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare | Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software |
| Best use cases | Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work, Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team, Healthcare product UX with a boutique studio |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Gapsy Studio vs ANML: pros and cons
| Gapsy Studio | |
|---|---|
| + | 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this roster |
| + | 13+ international design awards across Behance, Awwwards, FWA, CSS Winner, Titan Awards, and DesignRush |
| + | 500+ completed projects demonstrates a substantial delivery track record |
| + | Covers five distinct industries (fintech, SaaS, health, education, retail) from one team |
| - | Doesn't publish a specific headcount, describing itself as a 'collective' — harder to gauge delivery capacity |
| - | Founding year is self-reported ('since 2014') rather than independently confirmed |
| - | Its broad five-industry positioning trades off some depth against single-vertical specialists like UXDA |
| ANML | |
|---|---|
| + | 13 years of continuous operation since 2012 |
| + | A roughly 10-person team means direct access to senior designers on every project |
| + | Focused specifically on B2B, healthcare, and AI rather than spreading across unrelated verticals |
| + | Boutique scale keeps overhead — and likely pricing — lower than mid-size studios |
| - | A ~10-person team caps capacity for large or multi-workstream programs |
| - | Minimum engagement isn't published, so budget planning requires a direct conversation |
| - | Small scale means less multi-region delivery capacity than larger studios on this list |
Who should choose Gapsy Studio?
A typical fit: fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work.
A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount. Minimum engagement starts at $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). Works best with clients in Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software, Healthcare, EdTech, E-commerce / retail.
Who should choose ANML?
A typical fit: B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team.
One of the smallest teams in this roster, giving clients the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work. Minimum engagement starts at Not published. Works best with clients in Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software.
Decision matrix: Gapsy Studio vs ANML
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Gapsy Studio |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Gapsy Studio |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Compare: Gapsy Studio ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable)) vs ANML (Not published) |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Gapsy Studio |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Both may offer discovery engagements |
Use case fit: Gapsy Studio vs ANML
| Use case | Gapsy Studio fit | ANML fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fintech app UI/UX with brand identity work | Strong | Limited | Gapsy Studio |
| Healthcare or EdTech product redesign | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| B2B SaaS product design for a small, senior team | Limited | Strong | ANML |
| Healthcare product UX with a boutique studio | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Fixed-price product build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Dedicated design team augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Gapsy Studio vs ANML
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Product Design projects. A perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount.
ANML (3.8/5) is worth a look if you need healthcare product UX with a boutique studio. If your situation matches that, ANML is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Gapsy Studio vs ANML FAQ
Is Gapsy Studio better than ANML?
Gapsy Studio (4.5/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Gapsy Studio's strongest advantage: 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 public reviews — one of the highest verified scores in this roster. ANML's strongest advantage: 13 years of continuous operation since 2012.
How do Gapsy Studio and ANML differ in pricing?
Gapsy Studio uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $10K (per company website; independently unverifiable). ANML uses fixed project pricing with a minimum engagement of Not published. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Gapsy Studio or ANML?
Gapsy Studio is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each agency before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Gapsy Studio and ANML?
Gapsy Studio's primary differentiator is: a perfect 5.0/5.0 Clutch rating across 52 reviews, backed by 13+ international awards, from a studio that doesn't publish its own headcount. ANML's primary differentiator is: one of the smallest teams in this roster, giving clients the highest senior-to-client ratio for B2B, healthcare, and AI work. They also differ in team size (Collective model, size not published (500+ completed projects) vs ~10 (per LinkedIn)), minimum engagement ($10K (per company website; independently unverifiable) vs Not published), and primary industries served (Financial services / fintech, SaaS / B2B software vs Healthcare, SaaS / B2B software).
Verify all details directly with each agency before making a decision.